AI模型排行榜每天都在变,但真正决定你用不用它的,其实是价格和桌面体验
我现在对 AI 编程工具的排序:
🥇 Claude:最好用,但最贵
🥈 GPT Codex:第二选择,便宜很多,桌面端体验目前最强
🥉 OpenCode:最值得看的开源框架,可接中文模型
4️⃣ Cursor Composer 2.5:基于 Kimi,便宜、能用、性价比高
pi、goose、copilot 这些也有亮点,但综合体验还差一截。
OpenClaw、Hermes 不建议放在一起比。
它们更像自主 Agent / 长期任务系统,已经是另一个赛道了。
Happy Saturday Frens 🧚♂️
The AI leaderboard never stays the same for long.
今天的人工智能排行榜从不长久。
Today’s favorite model can easily be replaced tomorrow.
今天的热门模型,明天就可能被取代。
GPT leads today, Claude takes attention tomorrow.
GPT 今天领先,Claude 明天吸走关注。
Next week, another open-source model could become the headline.
下周,又一个开源模型可能登上头条。
The real issue is that your memory and context often disappear with the model.
真正的问题在于:你的记忆和上下文常常随模型一起消失。
Most AI platforms still tie your history to a single system.
大多数 AI 平台仍将你的历史绑定在单一系统上。
When that system loses relevance, continuity is lost.
当该系统失去相关性时,连续性也就中断了。
Users are forced to rebuild workflows and context from scratch.
用户被迫从零开始重建工作流和上下文。
@TheARCTERMINAL 是另辟蹊径的一方。
它正在构建一个基于浏览器的链上操作系统,以持久化身份与记忆为核心设计理念。
Your context lives on the substrate rather than the model.
你的上下文存于底层基础(substrate)之上,而非依附于某个模型。
This means you can switch models freely without losing continuity.
这意味着你可以自由切换模型,而不会丢失连续性。
Technology changes quickly and narratives come and go.
技术迭代飞快,叙事来去无常。
Your digital life shouldn’t have to restart every time the market shifts.
你的数字生活不该每次市场转向就重头再来。
A future where memory outlives the hype cycle feels long overdue.
一个让记忆超越炒作周期的未来,早已姗姗来迟。
Ownership of context may become just as important as access to AI itself.
对上下文的拥有权,或将变得与获取 AI 本身同等重要。
Who else is tired of rebuilding their AI setup every few months?
还有谁厌倦了每隔几个月就要重建自己的 AI 设置?
What’s your biggest model-switching frustration?
你切换模型时最大的困扰是什么?
本文由 AI 翻译自英文原帖,技术名词保留英文。
查看 X 原帖